24.12.11

Chapters 41 - 50

41
Obedience is known to be the first good among all the introductory virtues for, to begin with, it sets aside our conceit and begets in us humility.  Whence to those who sustain it gladly it also becomes an entrance and a gate of love towards God.  Having set this aside, Adam slipped away into the Tartarean deep.  Having in the word of the Dispensation[1] ardently loved this up to the Cross and death, the Lord was obedient to his own Father (and this although he was in no way less than the Father’s greatness), so that having through his own obedience paid in full[2] the crime of Mankind’s disobedience he lead again to the blessed and eternal life those who have lived in obedience.[3]  Therefore those who sustain a battle against the conceit of the Devil must first take a care to obedience, for as we progress it will without deception show us all the paths of the virtues.
42
Temperance is the common name of all the virtues.  Therefore he who is keeping temperance must be temperate in everything.  For just as whatever smallest member of a man that is removed disfigures the whole of the man, however insignificant the part that is missing from the form, thus he who neglects one of the virtues makes the whole dignity of temperance disappear in a way that he does not know.  One must therefore apply oneself not only to the bodily virtues but also to those able to purify our inner man.  For what profit is it to someone who has kept the body in virginity if the soul has committed adultery with the demon of disobedience?  Or how will he be crowned who has refrained from gluttony and every bodily desire but who has not taken a care to conceit and ambition, neither sustained a slight affliction, when the scales counterbalance the light of justice to those who are practising the works of justice in a spirit of humility?[4]
43
Those engaged in ascetical struggles must take a care to hate all the irrational desires in such a way as to acquire the hatred for them as a habit; however, it is necessary to preserve temperance in regard to foods in such a way that one never comes into a loathing for any of them, for this is both accursed and completely demonic.  For we do not abstain from any of them because they are wicked—may it not be so!—but so that, breaking ourselves off from the many and good foods, we proportionately mortify the inflamed parts of the body, and, further, so that our abundance become a sufficient provision for the poor, which very thing is the identifying mark of true love.
44
To eat and drink from all those things served or mixed,[5] giving thanks to God, in no way battles against the rule of gnosis,[6] ‘for all things were exceedingly good.’  To abstain gladly from the tasty and the many is both most discerning and more gnostic,[7] for we would not gladly despise the tasty foods which are present if we did not [first] taste the sweetness of God in every [spiritual] perception and inner spiritual assurance.
45
In the same way that weighed down by a multitude of foods the body makes the mind somewhat timid and slow-moving, so also weakened by much temperance the body renders the contemplative part of the soul[8] somewhat gloomy and indisposed to letters.  Therefore one must also prepare the foods in accordance with the movements of the body, so that when the body is healthy it be appropriately mortified but when it is weak it be moderately fattened.  For he who is waging ascetical struggles must not be exhausted in body but only so much as is enough for him still to have strength for the struggle, so that even in the labours of the body[9] the soul be appropriately purified.[10]
46
When vainglory is greatly inflamed against us, finding a pretext for its own evil in the sojourn of certain brothers or of any strangers at all, it is good to permit the moderate relaxation of the customary diet.  For we will send the demon[11] away not having accomplished anything and rather mourning the endeavour; moreover, we will fulfil the institution of love in an acceptable way and we will by means of the condescension preserve the mystery of temperance free from ostentation.
47
Fasting has a boast in itself but not towards God, for it is as it were a tool which trains those who wish in chastity.  Therefore we who contend for piety must not think great things of it but await in the faith of God the perfection of our goal, for the masters of any of the arts whatsoever never boast of the result of their profession from the tools but each of them awaits the final product[12] of the endeavour so that from it the exactness of the art be demonstrated.[13]
48
In the way that the earth, moderately watered, sends forth the seed sown in it pure and greatly increased, but, becoming drunk from the many rains, bears only thistles and thorns, thus also the land of the heart if we should make moderate use of wine yields pure its natural seeds and brings forth greatly thriving and very fruitful that which has been sown in it by the Holy Spirit,[14] but if it should become sodden from hard drinking it really bears all its thoughts as thorns and thistles.
49
When our mind swims in the wave of hard drinking, it not only sees in its sleep the impassioned phantoms figured by the demons but moulding in itself certain fine apparitions it also makes ardent use of its own fantasies as loved ones of a sort.  For when the organs of intercourse are warmed by the heat of the wine, there is every need for the mind to present to itself a voluptuous shadow of the passion.  Therefore, it is necessary that making use in moderation we avoid the damage from excess.  For when the mind does not have pleasure dragging it down to paint a picture of sin, it remains completely without fantasy and, what is better, without effeminacy.
50
All the manufactured drinks, which nowadays are called aperitifs by the artisans of this invention, on account of the fact, so it seems, that they guide the multitude of foods into the stomach, must not be pursued by those who wish to mortify the parts of the body that swell.  For not only does their quality become damaging to the ascetically contending bodies but their absurd blending itself also wounds the God-bearing conscience.  For what then is it that is lacking in the nature of wine that by the mixture of various aromatics its firmness should be made effeminate?


[1] Given that he continues with a quotation from Paul, the author seems to mean ‘according to the New Testament’.
[2] Greek: eklusas.  This verb takes on a variety of meanings and our rendition should not be taken as establishing St Diadochos’ position on the nature of Christ’s redemptive act on the Cross.
[3] The author’s intended audience is persons living or desiring to live the monastic life of asceticism.
[4] The Greek is not entirely clear.  However, the author is clearly referring to the Last Judgement.
[5] It is difficult to convey simply but in St Diadochos’ day foods were served and drinks—especially wines—were mixed.
[6] I.e. the monastic rule, whose goal is gnosis.
[7] More gnostic.  Greek: gnostikoteron.  I.e. showing more experience of gnosis.
[8] This is the mind.
[9] I.e. in manual labour.
[10] The Greek of the sentence is very terse.  What the author means is that the ascetic must not exhaust himself by fasting but only fast to the point that he still retains enough strength for the ascetical struggle, including bodily labour which itself is useful for the purification of the soul.
[11] I.e. the demon of vainglory.
[12] Greek: eidos.
[13] The author has in mind the sculptor, say, who does not boast of his hammer and chisel, but waits to show the final form of the sculpture, so that from it the exactness of his art might be demonstrated (recall that in the ancient world, the artist attempted to mirror nature, not to create an autonomous work of art divorced from nature, as today).
[14] The author foresees the ‘natural seeds’ of the heart and those ‘sown in it the Holy Spirit’.  This would correspond to a concept of natural and supernatural virtue.

Chapters 51 - 60

51
Our Lord and Teacher of this our sacred way of life, Jesus Christ, was in the Passion given vinegar to drink by the ministrants of the diabolical commands so that, it seems to me, he leave us a clear model of the [proper] disposition towards the sacred [ascetical] struggles.  For, it says, those who are contending against sin must not make use of tasty drinks or foods but rather sustain the bitterness of the [ascetical] battle with patience.  Let the hyssop also be added to the sponge of contempt so that the figure of our purification be brought into the model perfectly.  For acridity is the characteristic of struggles whereas that which purifies is at all events the characteristic of perfection.[1]
52
Let no one proclaim that going to the bath[2] is sinful or absurd; however, I say that to abstain from this for the sake of temperance is both manly and most prudent.  For then neither does that delightful moisture render our body effeminate nor do we come into recollection of that inglorious nakedness of Adam so that we take a care to his leaves to cover the secondary cause of shame;[3] and certainly we who have just jumped out of the utter destruction of worldly life ought to be united to the beauty of chastity in the purity of our body.
53
There is nothing that impedes summoning doctors in the time of illnesses.  For since at some time the art was going to be gathered by human experience,[4] for that reason the medicines also pre-existed.  Still, we must not place our hope of healing in doctors but in our true Saviour and Physician, Jesus Christ.  I say these things to those who accomplish the goal of temperance in cœnobia[5] and in cities since they are unable to have the ceaseless activity of faith [working] through love because of the difficult situations which occur, and moreover so that they not fall into vainglory and the temptation of the Devil.  Of whom, some of them proclaim among the populace that they have no need of doctors.  However, if one should accomplish the anchoretic life in more desolate places among two or three brothers leading the same way of life, then let him bring himself in faith only to the Lord, him who heals our every illness and every infirmity, even if he should fall into any sort of afflictions at all.  For after the Lord he has the wilderness as sufficient consolation for the illnesses.  Whence neither does such a person ever lack the activity of faith and, to be sure, since making use of the wilderness as a good screen nor does he find anywhere to exhibit his virtue of patience.[6]  For because of this, ‘The Lord makes solitaries to dwell in a house.’
54
When we are greatly disgusted with the bodily anomalies that happen to us[7] we must know that our soul is still enslaved to the desires of the body.  On which account, longing for material successes the soul neither wishes to depart from the good things of life but also considers it a big distracting business not to be able to make use of the fine things of life because of the illnesses.  But if with thanksgiving it accepts the troubles that arise from the illnesses, the soul is known not to be far from the boundaries of dispassion, whence it then even accepts death with joy, as being the occasion rather of true life.
55
The soul would not desire to depart from the body unless its disposition towards this very air became without quality to it.  For all the senses of the body are opposed to faith, since the former occur in connection with the present things while the latter proclaims only the extravagance of future goods.  It therefore befits the contender in asceticism never to ponder on certain trees with fine branches, or arbours, or fine-flowing fountains, or various meadows, or comely houses or even times passed with relatives, neither then to remember chance honours at the festivals, but on the one hand to make use of the necessary things with thanksgiving and on the other hand to consider life to be some foreign road desolate of every disposition of the flesh.  For only if we thus constrain our intellect might we return the whole of it to the track of the eternal road.[8]
56
That sight and taste and the remaining senses disperse the remembrance of the heart when we have made use of them beyond measure—Eve first speaks to us of such a thing.  For as long she did not look with pleasure on the tree of the command she kept in careful remembrance the commandment of God.  For which very reason she was as it were still covered by the wings of divine Eros[9], whence ignorant of her own nakedness.  But because she looked at the tree with pleasure and touched it with great desire and, furthermore, tasted the fruit of it with a certain active pleasure, she was immediately allured to bodily intertwining having been joined to the passion naked.  She then gave her whole desire over to the enjoyment of present things and through the sweet-appearing fruit joined Adam too to her own transgression, for which very reason thenceforth the human mind is only with difficulty able to keep God or his commandments in remembrance.  Therefore let us who ever look into the depths of our heart with ceaseless remembrance of God[10] pass this deceitful life with eyes that are as it were blind.[11]  For it is the characteristic of truly spiritual philosophy ever to preserve Eros unwinged for things seen.[12]  This the most experienced Job also teaches us, saying, ‘And if my heart also followed after my eye.’  Thus the matter constitutes a mark of extreme temperance.
57
He who ever sojourns in his own heart is in every way abroad from the fine things of life.  For walking in the Spirit he is unable to know the desires of the flesh.  Because such a person henceforth takes his walks in the fortress of the virtues, having those very virtues as it were as door-keepers of the city of his purity, then henceforth the war-machines of the demons become unavailing even if the arrows of vulgar Eros should to a certain extent reach right up to the windows of nature.[13]
58
When our soul begins no longer to desire the fine things of the earth then a certain mind of accidie[14] usually enters into it, neither allowing the soul to serve gladly in the ministry of the word nor leaving behind in it the intense desire for future goods; but even devaluing this temporal life exceedingly as not having a worthy work of virtue; and contemning this very gnosis, either as having already been granted to many others or as promising to signify to us nothing perfect.  We will escape from this tepid passion that makes us sluggish if we set very narrow boundaries to our intellect, gazing only towards the remembrance of God.  For only thus would the mind, running back to its own warmth, be able to depart from that irrational dispersion.[15]

59
When we have blocked all its exits with the memory of God, our mind at all events demands of us a work that ought to satisfy[16] its aptitude.  We must therefore give it only and wholly the ‘Lord Jesus’[17] towards realization of the goal.[18]  For it says: ‘No one says “Lord Jesus” except in the Holy Spirit.’  But at all events let this passage be viewed narrowly in one’s own treasure-rooms so that it not turn aside into some fantasies.[19]  For as many as unceasingly meditate on this holy and glorious name in the depth of their heart—these are at some time able to see the light of their mind.  For when this name is kept with close care by the intellect  it burns up in much [spiritual] perception all the filth that floats in the soul, for it also says: ‘Our God is a consuming fire.’  Whence, the Lord thenceforth calls the soul to much love of his own glory.  For when that glorious and much-longed-for name becomes chronic[20] in the warmth of the heart through remembrance by the mind, it at all events creates in us the habit of loving the goodness of God, there thenceforth being nothing that impedes this.  For this is the most valuable pearl which very thing one is able to acquire having sold all his property and to have unspeakable joy over his find.
60
One thing is introductory joy and another thing is perfecting joy.  For the former is not free of fantasy while the second has the power of humility; between these is God-loving sorrow and painless tears.[21]  For really, ‘In an abundance of wisdom is an abundance of gnosis;’ and, ‘He who has added gnosis will add pain.’  On account of this, therefore, one must with the introductory joy first call the soul to the struggles, and then the soul must be cross-examined and tested thenceforth by the truth of the Holy Spirit concerning the evils it has practised or even concerning the distractions it still practises.  For it says: ‘In rebukes concerning lawlessness you have instructed a man and you have melted his soul like a spider’s web;’ so that, the divine reproval having tried it just as in a crucible, the soul receive in the warm remembrance of God the activity of joy that is free of fantasy.


[1] The author began this chapter with the image of the vinegar given to the Lord in his Passion; the vinegar is later represented by the sponge on which the vinegar was offered.  The vinegar and the sponge represent the bitterness of the ascetical life.  The author then completes his metaphor by introducing hyssop, which in the Old Testament was used for purification.  He closes by saying that acridity (vinegar, sponge) is characteristic of ascetical struggles whereas that which purifies (hyssop) is characteristic of perfection.
[2] While this chapter was written at a time when the baths were public—with all the potential for scandal that that entailed—it clearly applies to more modern conditions where the bath might be more private.
[3] This Greek is unclear as regards the author’s precise meaning.
[4] The author has in mind the plants that in his day were gathered for use as medicines.  He is saying that since God foresaw that man would develop the art of medicine, He provided that the appropriate medicinal plants would exist.
[5] I.e. monasteries with many monks or nuns leading a group life.
[6] I.e. the wilderness acts as a screen between the hermit and the world, hiding him from other people.  The illness allows the hermit to exhibit his virtue of patience which he would not otherwise be able to exhibit because of his isolation: in the monastery one exhibits one's patience by bearing with other people.
[7] I.e. in an illness, especially a terminal illness such as cancer.
[8] This is an instruction for the advanced Hesychast to keep his mind on the contemplation of God, not letting it wander to thoughts and memories of earthly beauties and honours.  In practice, it would appear, the Hesychast would focus his intellect ever more straitly on the words of the Jesus Prayer.  The author is saying that only in this way can the Hesychast leave the ways of the earth for the ways of God. 
[9] I.e. Eve’s ardent love for God hid her nakedness from her own eyes.
[10] Unless St Diadochos is to be taken as speaking figuratively, then we have in this treatise not only the first clear reference to the Jesus Prayer but also in this clause the first clear reference to keeping the mind in the heart.  Since  in the next chapter the saint refers to sojourning in the heart, it is most probable that he is not speaking figuratively.   For his argument is that the Hesychast must force his intellect to leave behind material things so that, dwelling in the heart it should turn wholly to God.  But implicit in this instruction is the Evagrian understanding that the mind must leave behind all mental images of created things in order to attain to the ‘place of God’ (see Peri Logismon 40, 41).  It should also be noted that St Diadochos is clearly teaching disciples well-informed as to the practical techniques he discusses.  His conciseness on these matters must be understood in that light.
[11] I.e. to material beauty.
[12] I.e. true asceticism always entails restraining the desire from flying off after the senses.  This chapter is easier to understand if one considers that it is speaking to someone accustomed to practising the Jesus Prayer in the depths of his heart.  The tension that it describes is between continuing to recite the prayer in the depths of the heart versus the temptation to look out at the things of physical beauty around one.  This line of thought is continued in the next chapter.
[13] The basis of this chapter is the ascetic who maintains his mind in his heart.  Doing so, he has the virtues as custodians of the citadel of his chastity—that is, as custodians of his inner world of consciousness centred on his heart where he maintains his mind.  In such a case the demons can do him no harm even if they should to a certain extent reach right up to the windows of nature—that is, even should they arrive at exciting the ascetic’s very flesh.
[14] I.e. sloth.
[15] This is an instruction for an advanced Hesychast.
[16] Greek: plerophorein.  We have otherwise translated this word and its relatives as ‘(give) inner spiritual assurance’.  Here the sense is that since the mind must always be doing something—i.e. thinking.  This is a basic principle of Greek ascetical psychology.  We must give the mind something to do even (or perhaps especially) after we have closed the mind up in our heart in the memory of God.  That something is the Jesus Prayer.
[17] Assuming that the reading of the critical text in the vocative is correct, this is to be taken not as a reference to the Lord himself but as a reference to the particular formula in use among St Diadochos’ disciples for the recitation of the Jesus Prayer—whether the formula was merely ‘Lord Jesus’ in the vocative or something longer is immaterial to this point.
[18] This very important passage establishes that because it is the nature of the mind to do something, then when we have withdrawn our mind within ourselves in the remembrance of God, we must still give our mind something to do.  This something is the Jesus Prayer—and only and wholly the Jesus Prayer.
[19] I.e. the Hesychast should stick to the letter of the scripture passage, repeating just the words of the formula of the Jesus Prayer; otherwise there is a danger that he will give himself over to fantasies, which are to be avoided even if they are about the Lord Jesus (this would be taking the scripture passage broadly).
[20] Not in a negative sense but in the sense of something that continues over time.
[21] This is the so-called ‘gift of tears’—the ability of the Hesychast to weep over his sins whenever he wants and only when he wants.

Chapters 61 - 70

61
When the soul is agitated by anger or made turbid by drunkenness or troubled by severe despondency, then however one might press the mind, the mind is unable to become master of the remembrance of the Lord Jesus.  For having become wholly darkened by the terribleness of the passions, the mind becomes wholly estranged from its native [spiritual] sense; and for that very reason the mind does not have anywhere for the desire to imprint its seal so that the mind bear unforgettably the form of the meditation, the intellect’s memory having become hard from the rawness of the passions.[1]  If, however, the mind should be beyond these things, then even if what is desired[2] be stolen for a short time by forgetfulness, immediately the mind, making use of its natural aptitude, lays hold again of that highly desired and salvific prey.  For then the soul has Grace itself meditating together with it and crying the ‘Lord Jesus’[3] together with it, just as a mother might teach her own infant the word ‘father’, and, again, might meditate together with the infant on that word right up to the time that she guide the infant into the habit of calling clearly on the father even in sleep, to the exclusion of any other infantile speech at all.[4]  For this reason the Apostle says: ‘Similarly, then, the Spirit helps our weakness; for we do not know the ‘what shall we pray’ as it should be but the very Spirit intercedes for us with unutterable sighs.’  For since we are infants in regard to the perfect in the virtue of prayer, we at all events need the assistance of the Spirit so that, all our thoughts having been recollected and sweetened by the Spirit’s unspeakable sweetness, from our whole disposition we be set into motion towards the memory and love of our God and Father.  Wherefore we cry in the Spirit, as again the divine Paul says, when we are regulated by the Spirit to call on God the Father unceasingly: ‘Abba, Father.’[5]
62
More than the other passions anger has the custom to agitate and confuse the soul; however, there are occasions when it is of the greatest benefit to the soul.  For whenever we make use of anger without agitation against those who are acting impiously or in any way immorally, so that either they be saved or they be shamed, we provide an addition of meekness to the soul.  For in every way we concur with the goal of the righteousness and the goodness of God, but in addition, when we are sternly angered against sin we also often make manly the womanishness of the soul.  It must also not be doubted that if we rebuke the demon of corruption with anger when we are in great despondency we are minded above the boast of death.  So that he teach us this very thing, the Lord twice rebuking Hades in the Spirit and agitating himself—although doing everything he wants without agitation by an act of the will only—thus restored the soul of Lazarus to the body, so that prudent anger[6], it appears to me, rather has been given to our nature as a weapon by God who created us.  If Eve had made use of which very anger against the serpent she would not have been set into activity by that impassioned pleasure.  It therefore appears to me that he who prudently[7] makes use of anger on account of a zeal for piety will in every respect be found in the scale of recompenses[8] to be more tried and tested than he who is never moved to anger at all on account of an inertia of mind.  For the latter appears to have the charioteer of the human wits[9] unexercised whereas the former is ever brought on the horses of virtue into the midst of the front line of the phalanx of demons in battle, fully exercising the four-horse chariot of temperance[10] in the fear of God.  Which very thing we find spoken of by Scripture as ‘the chariot of Israel’ in the ascension of the divine Elias, for God first appears to speak in various ways concerning the four virtues to the Jews.  For which reason this one who was nourished so much in wisdom was entirely taken up on a chariot of fire, the prudent one[11], it seems to me, using his own virtues as horses, in the Spirit which ravished him in a breeze[12] of fire.
63
He who partakes of holy gnosis and tastes the sweetness of God ought neither to sit in judgement[13] nor under any circumstances bring a law-suit against anyone, even should someone take those very things in which he is clothed.  For the righteousness of the rulers of this world is at all events defeated in the righteousness of God or, rather, it is nothing compared to what is right before God, because what difference is there between those who are nourished by God and the men of this Age[14] if not that what is right before the latter would appear imperfect compared to the righteousness of the former, so that the one be called human right and the other divine righteousness?  So neither therefore did our Lord Jesus upbraid in return when he was being upbraided nor did he threaten when he was suffering, but he endured in silence even the removal of his clothing and, to say the great thing, prayed the Father for the salvation of the wrongdoers.  However, the men of this world would not cease to go to law unless occasionally they should [beforehand] regain with something extra the things for which they are going to law,[15] and certainly when they receive the interest before the principal[16]—so that their right often becomes the beginning of a great injustice.
64
While certain pious persons were speaking I heard one say that we must not allow any chance individuals to seize those very things which we have for our own administration or even for the repose of the poor, and certainly not if we suffer this from Christians—so that we not become occasions of sin to those who do us injustice through those things towards which we are long-suffering.[17]  This is nothing more than to want one’s goods rather than oneself, coupled with an absurd excuse.  For if abandoning prayer and attention to my own heart I little by little begin to proclaim law-suits against those who wish to use me badly and to frequent the vestibules of the law-courts, it is obvious that I consider the things sought greater than my own salvation, not to say greater even than that salvific command.  For how at all costs will I follow the evangelical command which orders me, ‘And do not demand your things from him who takes them;’ unless in accordance with the Apostolic saying I endure with joy the plundering of those things which belong to me—when, going to law and recovering as much as he wanted, usually one would still not have freed the avaricious person from his sin?[18]  Moreover, the corruptible courts are not able to delimit the incorruptible judgement seat of God, for at all events the accused answers fully only to those particular laws before which he happens to defend himself and in support of his case.[19]  So it is good for us to bear the violence of those who wish to commit an injustice against us and to pray for them, so that they be freed from the crime of avarice through repentance and not through the restitution of those things of ours which they have seized.  For this is what the righteousness of the Lord wishes, that we at some time take back not that which was coveted but the avaricious person free of sin through repentance.
65
Once we have come to know the road of piety it is most appropriate and beneficial in every respect immediately to sell all our goods and to manage the monies from them in accordance with the commandment of the Lord, and not to disobey the salvific command with the excuse that we want to keep the commandments always.[20]  For from this there will be for us first the good freedom from care and on account of that thenceforth an uncrafty poverty minded above every injustice and every law-suit since we no longer have the material which ignites the fire of the covetous.  And more than the other virtues humility will then warm us round and give us repose in its own bosom as being naked—like a mother who takes up and completely warms in her arms her own child when in its childish simplicity it has taken off and thrown somewhere far away its own clothing, on account of its great guilelessness enjoying its nakedness rather than the many colours of the clothing.  For it says: ‘The Lord guards the infants; I humbled myself and he saved me.’
66
The Lord will at all events demand of us an account of our almsgiving according to what we have, not according to what we have not.  Therefore, if on account of the fear of the Lord I scatter in a goodly way in little time whatever I had to give over many years, concerning what will I who have nothing still be arraigned?  But someone will say: ‘Whence then will those poor be shown pity who were accustomed to being managed bit by bit from our modest means?’  Let such a person learn not to upbraid God from the actual motive[21] of his own love of money.  For God will not lack, managing his own creature as from the beginning.  For neither did the poor lack for food or clothing before this or that person rose up in charity.  It is therefore good that, strictly in accordance with this very knowledge[22], we cast off with a good ministry the foolish boast that arises from wealth, hating our own desires—which very thing is to hate our own soul—so that we no longer hold our soul in great contempt by rejoicing over the scattering of money as working nothing of the virtues.  For as long as we are somewhat well-provided with goods, we rejoice greatly over their scattering (if indeed there is an activity of the good in us), as cheerfully ministering to the divine commandment; but when we have exhausted our goods, then limitless sorrow and lowliness steal over us as practising nothing worthy of righteousness.  Whence thereafter the soul returns to itself in great humility so that whatever it cannot acquire day by day by means of almsgiving it take a care to acquire in itself from assiduous prayer, patient endurance and humility.  For it says: ‘The beggar and the poor man will praise your name, O Lord.’  For  neither is the charism of theology[23] made ready by God for someone unless he make himself ready by divesting himself of all his goods for the sake of the glory of the Gospel of God, so that he preach the wealth of the Kingdom of God in a God-loving poverty.  For he clearly means this very thing who said, ‘You have prepared for the beggar in your goodness, O Lord;’ and added, ‘God will give speech in great power to those who preach the Gospel.’
67
All the charisms of our God are exceedingly good[24] and able to provide every goodness but nothing kindles and moves our heart to the love of God’s goodness like theology.  For being the precocious offspring of the Grace of God it is at all events the first charism[25] to grant even gifts to the soul.  First, it prepares us to despise with joy all the friendship of this life since we have instead of corruptible desires the sayings of God as unspeakable wealth.  Next, it illuminates our mind with the fire of change[26], whence it even makes our mind to be in communion with the ministering spirits.[27]  Therefore, beloved, we who have been prepared for it beforehand genuinely yearn after this virtue; this comely virtue; this virtue which sees all; this virtue which provides every freedom from care; this virtue which nourishes the mind in a dawn of unspeakable light in the words of God; and, not to go on at length, this virtue which by means of the holy Prophets harmonizes the rational soul towards an inseparable communion with the Word of God, so that even among men—Oh the wonder!—the Divine Leader of the Bride[28] harmonize the God-given voices singing clearly the mighty deeds of God.[29]
68
Most of the time our mind finds prayer[30] hard to bear because of the extremely narrow and restrained character[31] of the virtue of prayer;[32] however it gives itself over to theology rejoicing because of the broad and released nature of the divine contemplations.[33]  Therefore, so that we do not give a road to the mind to want to speak much, or even allow it to take wing beyond measure in its joy, let us for the most part spend our time in prayer, and [secondarily] in psalmody and the reading of Holy Scripture, not overlooking the contemplations[34] of learned men whose faith is recognized through their words.[35]  For if we do this, neither will we prepare the mind to mix its own sayings[36] with the words[37] of Grace nor will we allow the mind to be dragged under by vainglory, the mind having been dissipated through much joy and loquacity; but we will also keep the mind outside of fantasy in the time of contemplation[38], and from this we will procure for the mind that almost all its thoughts be tearful[39].  For reposing in the times of stillness[40] and indeed sweetened by the sweetness of the prayer[41], the mind does not only come to be outside the aforementioned faults but is more and more renewed in the acute and painless intuitive apprehension of divine contemplations[42], along with progressing with much humility in the contemplation[43] of discernment.  However, it must be known that there is a prayer[44] which is above every diffuseness.  This prayer is only of those who are filled with divine Grace in every [spiritual] sense and inner spiritual assurance.
69
In the beginning Grace is accustomed to illuminate the mind in much [spiritual] perception in Grace’s own light but as the battles progress it usually sets its own mysteries into action in the theological soul[45] in an unknown manner, so that in the first case it let us loose rejoicing on the trail of the divine contemplations[46] as having been called from ignorance to gnosis, whereas it preserve our gnosis free from vainglory in the middle of the struggles.  We must therefore be moderately sorrowed as having been abandoned so that we be humbled more and submit more to the glory of the Lord, yet occasionally rejoice having been given wing in the good hope.[47]  For as great sorrow envelops the soul in despair and lack of faith, thus also great joy provokes it to conceit—I am speaking of those who are still in a state of [spiritual] infancy—, for the mean between illumination and abandonment is experience whereas the mean between sorrow and joy is hope.[48]  For it says: ‘Abiding patiently, I patiently abided the Lord and he took heed to me;’ and: ‘According to the multitude of the pains in my heart, your consolations have gladdened my soul.’
70
Just as the doors of the baths quickly propel the interior warmth towards the exterior when they are open, thus also the soul disperses its own remembrance [of God] through the gate of the voice when it wishes to discuss many things, even if it should say all things well.  Whence the soul is thenceforth deprived of seasonable thoughts[49] and speaks the clashing of its thoughts[50] more or less in a mob[51] to those who chance to be there, because thenceforth it does not have the Holy Spirit to preserve in it an intellect free of fantasy.  For as being foreign to all agitation and fantasy the Good [Spirit] ever flees garrulousness.  Therefore silence is good in its proper time, being nothing other than the mother of the wisest thoughts[52].


[1] What the author means is that because of the harshness of the passions that he lists, the mind is unable, even the ascetic wants, to establish the repetition of the Jesus Prayer in its consciousness.  The author makes the important psychological observation that the reason for this inability is that the ‘intellect’s memory’ has become hard because of the rawness of the passions.  This refers to the subjective conscious world of someone who is very upset: their interior mental world—their ‘fabric of consciousness’—is so ‘hardened’ by the passion that it is simply impossible for them to establish the repetition of the Prayer in it: the Prayer simply won’t ‘imprint’ the disturbed consciousness, which indeed has acquired a hardened texture.
[2] I.e. the Prayer of Jesus.
[3] This is again in the vocative, indicating that this is not the full text of the formula of the Jesus Prayer but rather the name of the formula.  In ecclesiastical practice, prayers often take their name from their first few words.  Compare the ‘Our Father’.
[4] This is a very important, if succinct, description of how through the action of Grace the mind is led to the automatic repetition of the formula of the Jesus Prayer even in sleep.
[5] Greek: Abba o pater.  Of course, Abba is the Aramaic familiar term for one’s own father that Jesus himself is recorded in the Gospel as having used for his Heavenly Father.
[6] ‘Prudent anger’: Greek: sophrona thumo.  It is hard to convey the nuance of this phrase in context.  The author wishes to refer to an anger that is of sound mind, in its senses, prudent, chaste; not an anger that is extreme, uncontrolled or impassioned.  There are many repetitions of sophron in its various cognate forms in this chapter.
[7] ‘In a prudent way’.  Greek: sophronos.
[8] I.e. at the Last Judgement.
[9] ‘Wits’: Greek: phrenes.  This word is a cognate of sophron, which is derived etymologically from ‘having the wits whole or sound’.
[10] Recall that the author has already established that ‘temperance’ is the common name of all the four virtues. Hence, he is now drawing an extended metaphor between the four virtues and the four-horse chariot on which the Prophet Elias ascended.
[11] ‘The prudent one’.  Greek: o sophron.
[12] Greek: aura.  In the Septuagint this word is used not for Elias’ ascension but for the theophany on Horeb: God appeared there to Elias not in the earthquake or storm but in the fine breeze (lepte aura).  Whether this is to be taken as an inadvertence on the part of the author or as a subtle allusion would depend on the reader’s judgement.
[13] Greek: dikazein.  Des Places interprets this as ‘ne doit pas se défendre en justice’. 
[14] I.e. by the world.
[15] I.e. they settle out of court advantageously.
[16] I.e. the payments are first applied to interest owed and then to principal.
[17] I.e. We are now showing long-suffering in the seizure by others, especially Christians, of our goods rather than preventing the seizure or prosecuting the culprits but supposedly we would prevent these persons from sinning if we were to take them to court (through the fear of the gendarme).
[18] This abrupt change from the first to the third person is in the text here and elsewhere.
[19] I.e. the court narrowly considers only the specific laws which apply to the matter at hand whereas the justice of God considers the whole situation, including the whole person involved.
[20] I.e. the author is counselling us to sell our goods and give the money away immediately, not to keep the money with the excuse that we want to fulfil over a long period the commandment to help the poor.
[21] ‘Actual motive’.  Greek: Prophasis.
[22] Cf. the beginning of Chapter 63.
[23] In this chapter the charism of theology seems to be the preaching of the Gospel.
[24] Greek: kala lian, in an allusion to the Genesis account of Creation (Septuagint).
[25] We take prota in an adverbial sense as following on ‘precocious’, but English cannot support a literal translation of the construction.  The author wants to exhort his disciples to concentrate on theology; hence he emphasizes theology as the first charism to grant gifts, thus exciting his disciples’ desire to occupy themselves with theology in the manner he describes.
[26] Greek: allage.  The use of this word seems a little imprecise for someone of St Diadochos’ literary stature, but there is probably a reference here to a phrase from the Psalms in the Septuagint: ‘This change is of the right hand of the Most High.’
[27] I.e. the angels.
[28] The soul is here treated as the bride of God being led to marriage with God by the Holy Spirit.
[29] The author seems to mean that the Holy Spirit, as the leader of the soul to God, harmonizes here on earth the spiritual voice of the soul with the voices of the angels and Prophets in Heaven.  There also seems to be an allusion to the participation of the monk or nun in the services of the monastery, where they would be united to the angels and saints in Heaven in singing the word of God (primarily the Psalms).  However, it must be said that we have no information on St. Diadochos’ monasteries and the services conducted in them.
[30] This would be the Jesus Prayer.  The author is saying that to concentrate the mind on the words of the Jesus Prayer, and especially so with the mind and the words of the Prayer focused in the heart, is actually quite vexing to the mind.
[31] The author is referring to the very concentrated, secret, private and silent practice of the Prayer of Jesus in the heart.  Everything is focused there.  It is terribly hard.
[32] Greek: euktikes aretes.  This should not be understood in a vague sort of way as the moral virtue of praying often (not that that is not a virtue) but more specifically as the practice of the Hesychast form of the Jesus Prayer.
[33] Greek: theoremata.  This normally refers to a speculative contemplation in the nature of ‘thinking about with words’, not an intuitive rapture of the mind into God.  The author is contrasting the very difficult focusing of the Prayer of Jesus as practised by the Hesychast he is addressing, and the release of the built-up mental tension of the Prayer in the practice of the speculative contemplations of theology.  Again, however, this theology is already defined by the author as a charism.  It is not academic theology.
[34] Greek: theoremata.  I.e. speculative theology.
[35] I.e. we should only read theological writers whose works are recognized to be sound.
[36] Greek: remata.
[37] Greek: logois.
[38] Greek: theoria.  This is direct intuitive sight of spiritual things.
[39] This is the Hesychast’s charism of tears.
[40] Geek: hesychias.
[41] Greek: euche.  This would again be the Prayer of Jesus repeated constantly.
[42] Greek: theoremata.  These would be speculative contemplations again.
[43] Greek: theoria.  This would be intuitive knowledge again.
[44] Greek: euche.  The author is referring to a certain high stage in the practice of the Jesus Prayer in Hesychasm.
[45] ‘Theological soul’.  Rutherford reads ‘theological intellect’ but this reading does not persuade us in context.  The phrase would refer to the Hesychast who now enjoys the charism of theology that the author has discussed in the previous chapters.
[46] Greek: theoremata.  These are the discursive contemplations of theology.  The image here seems to be of the dogs let loose with joyous barking on the trail of the quarry.
[47] This sentence is a capsule description of the spiritual state of an advanced Hesychast.
[48] The author is using the schema of traditional Greek philosophy: a virtue is a mean between two extremes.
[49] Greek: ennoion.
[50] Greek: logismon.
[51] ‘More or less in a mob’.  This refers to how the ascetic speaks, not to the people standing by.
[52] Greek: ennoion.